<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insurgents Intercept Drone Video Feeds.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cman.cx/blog/index.php/2009/12/17/insurgents-intercept-drone-video-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cman.cx/blog/index.php/2009/12/17/insurgents-intercept-drone-video-feeds/</link>
	<description>&#039;c&#039; is for: connor, clinton, computers, and change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vernon Lewis</title>
		<link>http://cman.cx/blog/index.php/2009/12/17/insurgents-intercept-drone-video-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Vernon Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cman.cx/blog/?p=817#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Seems to me like all the insurgents (why is this term used anyway?) are going to see is what we see, which is who/what is going to get hit next. I&#039;d think that would keep &#039;em on the run instead of in hiding. A roach on the run is easier to kill than a roach in hiding.

Been some talk lately about allowing the Taliban a seat at the table. Makes sense to me. After all, a good portion of the Afghan population seems to support them. What do you think, cman? Your bandwidth is a little broader than mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me like all the insurgents (why is this term used anyway?) are going to see is what we see, which is who/what is going to get hit next. I&#8217;d think that would keep &#8216;em on the run instead of in hiding. A roach on the run is easier to kill than a roach in hiding.</p>
<p>Been some talk lately about allowing the Taliban a seat at the table. Makes sense to me. After all, a good portion of the Afghan population seems to support them. What do you think, cman? Your bandwidth is a little broader than mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Peters</title>
		<link>http://cman.cx/blog/index.php/2009/12/17/insurgents-intercept-drone-video-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cman.cx/blog/?p=817#comment-680</guid>
		<description>There is a pretty good thread going on reddit about this!

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/afm5g/insurgents_hack_us_drones/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a pretty good thread going on reddit about this!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/afm5g/insurgents_hack_us_drones/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/afm5g/insurgents_hack_us_drones/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

